25/47
Anthony Hopkins had previously portrayed CS
Scenario
Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud invites Professor C.S. Lewis to debate the existence of God, Freud’s unique relationship with his daughter, and Lewis’s unconventional relationship with his best friend’s mother. Lewis in a scene in Zemlja (1993) 30 years before this film. Lewis examines the Gospels while a woman who appears to be his wife calls him to bed. The film is set in 1939, but Lewis did not marry Joy Davidman Gresham until 1956.
Variations on an original theme, Op
In reality, this woman was Janie Moore, with whom Lewis lived until 1949. [last sentence] Sigmund Freud: From error to error the whole truth is discovered. Appeared in the 7PM Project: April 19, 2024 episode (2024). 36, “Enigma” Variation 9: Nimrod Composed by Edward Elgar Performed by Symfonický orchester Slovenského rozhlasu (as the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra) & Adrian Leaper (conductor) Licensed by courtesy of Naxos Music UK Ltd. “Freud’s Last Session” is a huge disappointment for me.
This fictionalized meeting of the groundbreaking psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud (Anthony Hopkins) and the writer C
S. Lewis (Matthew Goode), which took place at the beginning of World War II, when the first German bombers arrived in England, does not force the audience to ask themselves what is going on? They try to find out, challenging themselves about the nature of man and whether or not God exists (Freud is an atheist, Lewis is a religious Christian). The material from Matt Brown’s play is poorly translated to screen, making it impossible to spend a solid 15 minutes with both characters alone in a session without constantly cutting back and forth between each character’s background moments or some current situation involving a bomb threat or Freud. #39; poor health that requires constant care from the daughter, and as a result we have some tense revelations about her relationship with her domineering father.
I don’t want them near each other (read Paul Roazen’s work on him)
And they tried so hard to make a plot twist out of it with this character and her secretary that it was annoying – especially when you know that while Freud didn’t condemn homosexuality as a moral issue, he did. You’d expect this to be more of a psychoanalysis session than a weird chat between famous authors with opposing views. Hell, since it wasn’t really a session, I still have no idea what Lewis was doing there. The verbal duels are the moments we look forward to, there are plenty of interesting bits and pieces in between, but the whole thing falls flat because either the dialogue isn’t all that brilliant; the editing makes the whole thing feel like a tennis match – there’s not a moment for a monologue or a sequence of plans; and the constant brushing aside of moments from the past that try to build some character or show some background, but it’s all distracting and boring. A film that touches on such ideals and challenges about humanity, God, faith and human relationships in the face of adversity or favoring everything, that there has to be some coherence between the action and the dialogue to create something that we, the audience, might question ourselves or not have thought about.
play in a smooth format
It has to evoke some emotion, even if those issues aren’t all that exciting (for some) and remain in the “boring” category. If there’s a play and film adaptation that has captured such emotion brilliantly, it’s “The Sunset Limited” starring Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones. It’s simple in its operation, as it stays in a small room in an apartment, and the brilliance of the complicated dialogue becomes a fascinating and stunning experience. Hopkins and Goode don’t have the same dynamic, although they achieve good results.